decrease defense the new shield

DrunkSincerity · **Posted:** 27 Jun 2010, 22:57

this is bs, archers need to be fun too

iSanji · **Posted:** 27 Jun 2010, 23:42

so? what you except , that you will solo a priest? that you will solo a mage?
that you will solo a rogue with a shield?

Its not that shield its how you play ok?

today we was like 7 ppl vs 3 human pts, we still won..

its about how you play not the items....

220Volti · **Posted:** 28 Jun 2010, 10:26

all they need to do is add int requirment (like tier shield) to the noneflammable shield... something like 122 int requirment... cause i dont see why any other class except a tanking priest need the luxury of using a shield in pk... (rogues can use +0 CS which is more than enough with their minoring and running skills)

Alphar · **Posted:** 28 Jun 2010, 14:54

like alweys you are idiot 220

you wanna int becuse you are plaing priest so get the f off

Shiedl shood requirment dex ye do you like it 220 ??? the best shood be 255 dex need

lol

this shield is f crap noob archer run on it and asasin cant kil him omg wtf ???

On this shield i can tank on asasin 3 asasin wtf ??? this is crap

and mag ??? lol sory but no if rely nned have some thing shood be beter mor resist or somthing or mor defnes but shood need 200 + int

so not evry noobmage can yous it and if you wanna priest ok yous it but put f int lot off

220Volti · **Posted:** 28 Jun 2010, 19:23

Lemnar wrote:

like alweys you are idiot 220

you wanna int becuse you are plaing priest so get the f off
Shiedl shood requirment dex ye do you like it 220 ??? the best shood be 255 dex need
lol
this shield is f crap noob archer run on it and asasin cant kil him omg wtf ???
On this shield i can tank on asasin 3 asasin wtf ??? this is crap
and mag ??? lol sory but no if rely nned have some thing shood be beter mor resist or somthing or mor defnes but shood need 200 + int

so not evry noobmage can yous it and if you wanna priest ok yous it but put f int lot off

WHAT THE fu** ARE U TALKING ABOUT???
i cant understand whats the point of ur post? take an english lesson (better yet take 20) and learn to express urself before u spamming senseless crap.
and btw whats ur in game name?

P0k3M0n · **Posted:** 28 Jun 2010, 19:28

We staff are talking about Defense of the new shield, it's probably to be decreased, but it will stay available for all Classes, cause there is no point to do the quest just for priest and mages..

See you

ARROW · **Posted:** 28 Jun 2010, 22:20

It shouldn't be available for all classes at all. If the 85 quest needs to have an item for all classes just put in other drops, shield is too powerful, once every player has 1 maxko will not be fun.

Soon after that all will want more attack power to compensate for it. What then? More weapons with more ap. On and on.

To those saying tier shield is the same I remind you that tier has stat requirements on it therefore its far from "the same". Putting an int requirement on nfs might not be a bad idea at all.

The nonflammableshield was a mistake to add in my opinion. GM's should begin a poll to see what all players want to do about this shield. Like, delete, lower stat, stat req's etc.

iSanji · **Posted:** 28 Jun 2010, 23:25

wow, i just see Archers complaining about that shield
not even 1 warrior or any other char...

im for, remove archers or arrow's so then you have to go play assasin

GM_Flegy · **Posted:** 01 Jul 2010, 10:10

WarcryGER wrote:

wow, i just see Archers complaining about that shield
not even 1 warrior or any other char...

im for, remove archers or arrow's so then you have to go play assasin

becase that is only shield what have arrow def

iSanji · **Posted:** 01 Jul 2010, 10:17

GM_Flegy wrote:

WarcryGER wrote:

wow, i just see Archers complaining about that shield
not even 1 warrior or any other char...

im for, remove archers or arrow's so then you have to go play assasin

becase that is only shield what have arrow def

what about dol?
it also got arrow def.

decrease defense the new shield

Who is online